Algemeen
Hardware
Additional
Included
- RoadPod® VT4 Verkeersteller
- Handleiding
- Software MTE®
Required add ons
- Veldapparatuur voor verkeersstudies
- Datacommunicatie kabel
Eye Opener
"It was truly an eye opener to realise how much information can be collected from a couple of rubber tubes."
The Department of Civil Engineering, RV College of Engineering in New Delhi, India, evaluated the RoadPod VT and RoadPot VT4 in September 2021. The evaluation concluded that MetroCount’s traffic counters performed at over 95% accuracy which is considered exceptionally good in Indian traffic conditions.
The Tasmanian Department of Transport has tested our Vehicle Tube Classifier's accuracy against the precision of video records. The results: the MetroCount equipment showed 100.0% accuracy across 12 Classes of Australian AUSTROADS Class Scheme.
The North Dakota State University conducted research on the Accuracy of Traffic Detection Devices. Their study showed that MetroCount is the most accurate logger, and determined their agency to purchase our system.
In 2001, the University of Central Florida has investigated heavy truck freight movement. To measure the impact, they have used a variety of traffic counters. According to their findings the MetroCount unit "was more dependable than other counters".
Traffic Counting with the RoadPod VT4 - A Matrix Study
Matrix Traffic and Transport Data recently tested the RoadPod® VT4, MetroCount’s new four-tube traffic counter/classifier. We chatted with Matrix’s General Manager, Giles Smith, to discuss the independent testing completed and to share results.
Université de Central Florida
Deux tests statistiques différents (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test et T-Test) ont été effectués pour démontrer statistiquement la fiabilité raisonnable des données des tubes de comptage du trafic. Les deux tests statistiques ont révélé qu'il n'y a pas de différence significative, à un niveau de confiance de 95 %, entre les volumes de trafic réels et les volumes obtenus à partir des tubes de comptage du trafic.
University of Central Florida
Two different statistical tests (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and T-Test) were performed to statistically demonstrate reasonable reliability of the traffic counting tubes data. Both statistical tests revealed there is no significant difference, at the 95% confidence level, between the actual traffic volumes and volumes obtained from the traffic counting tubes.
University of Central Florida
Two different statistical tests (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and T-Test) were performed to statistically demonstrate reasonable reliability of the traffic counting tubes data. Both statistical tests revealed there is no significant difference, at the 95% confidence level, between the actual traffic volumes and volumes obtained from the traffic counting tubes.
University of Central Florida
Two different statistical tests (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and T-Test) were performed to statistically demonstrate reasonable reliability of the traffic counting tubes data. Both statistical tests revealed there is no significant difference, at the 95% confidence level, between the actual traffic volumes and volumes obtained from the traffic counting tubes.
University of Central Florida
Se realizaron dos pruebas estadísticas diferentes (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test y T-Test) para demostrar estadísticamente la fiabilidad razonable de los datos de los tubos de conteo de tráfico. Ambas pruebas revelaron que no hay una diferencia significativa, con un nivel de confianza del 95%, entre los volúmenes de tráfico reales y los volúmenes obtenidos de los tubos de conteo de tráfico.